Or, in other words, why have I written the primary
And why do I consider a textual, linear version
to be a secondary artifact of the first?
The answer to these questions can be found, implicitly, through the experience
of this hypertextual node.
It is in between all the
It is the hypertextual, rhizomatic linkings that
weave these pages together in a diversity of layers and simultaneously
open it up to the
almost infinite world
wide web, where there is no there there.
It is in the dynamic reading/writing experience, where readers have more
overt control to "read" as they choose.
And the writer can continually, and performatively, update the document.
It is a living document in which the process allows the content to grow
and change as long as it is attended to.
It never has to be completed as long as the author (and others) continue
to add to it.